My dream team
Quote from Lock5 on February 14, 2022, 10:28 pmThis is what I consider to be my dream team.
This is what I consider to be my dream team.
Uploaded files:Quote from Tristan Carlos on February 15, 2022, 7:00 pmQuote from Lock5 on February 14, 2022, 10:28 pmThis is what I consider to be my dream team.
it covers pretty much all focal lengths one would need 99% of the time. Nice lineup!
Quote from Lock5 on February 14, 2022, 10:28 pmThis is what I consider to be my dream team.
it covers pretty much all focal lengths one would need 99% of the time. Nice lineup!
Quote from Beau Carpenter on July 16, 2022, 12:45 pmNice setup! I'm looking to add a 10-24 from Fujifilm to my kit one of these days!
Nice setup! I'm looking to add a 10-24 from Fujifilm to my kit one of these days!
Quote from JBP on July 16, 2022, 3:16 pmI'm also looking to add some wider angles to my kit. I have nothing below 17mm currently. Also a superzoom from 18-250 or 300 would be grand. @lock5's three lenses cover it all!
I'm also looking to add some wider angles to my kit. I have nothing below 17mm currently. Also a superzoom from 18-250 or 300 would be grand. @lock5's three lenses cover it all!
Quote from James Warner on July 17, 2022, 12:39 amNice kit! I have the 50-135 and can attest it is a great lens. The 10-24 seems like a nice wide angle zoom. @jbp There's also the Sigma 10-20 that can be had for cheap and I've heard from a few people they liked it. I have the Pentax 12-24 but that is a bit more, and I don't think much better optically. I'd have to check that for sure though.
I've also used the 10-17mm fisheye, and that's an interesting one. The fisheye effect is string at 10mm, but as you close in towards 17mm it gets less and less so making it almost a normal wide angle. Still more distorted than a normal ultra wide, but not fisheye.
Nice kit! I have the 50-135 and can attest it is a great lens. The 10-24 seems like a nice wide angle zoom. @jbp There's also the Sigma 10-20 that can be had for cheap and I've heard from a few people they liked it. I have the Pentax 12-24 but that is a bit more, and I don't think much better optically. I'd have to check that for sure though.
I've also used the 10-17mm fisheye, and that's an interesting one. The fisheye effect is string at 10mm, but as you close in towards 17mm it gets less and less so making it almost a normal wide angle. Still more distorted than a normal ultra wide, but not fisheye.
Quote from ahoyhere on July 17, 2022, 1:01 amI had the Sigma 10-20mm back in the day (circa 2008) for my Nikon D300 and it was good then. I imagine any updates would be better.
I had the Sigma 10-20mm back in the day (circa 2008) for my Nikon D300 and it was good then. I imagine any updates would be better.
Quote from JBP on August 13, 2022, 6:54 pmQuote from James Warner on July 17, 2022, 12:39 amNice kit! I have the 50-135 and can attest it is a great lens. The 10-24 seems like a nice wide angle zoom. @jbp There's also the Sigma 10-20 that can be had for cheap and I've heard from a few people they liked it. I have the Pentax 12-24 but that is a bit more, and I don't think much better optically. I'd have to check that for sure though.
I've also used the 10-17mm fisheye, and that's an interesting one. The fisheye effect is string at 10mm, but as you close in towards 17mm it gets less and less so making it almost a normal wide angle. Still more distorted than a normal ultra wide, but not fisheye.
Quote from ahoyhere on July 17, 2022, 1:01 amI had the Sigma 10-20mm back in the day (circa 2008) for my Nikon D300 and it was good then. I imagine any updates would be better.
Good advice! I added the 10-20 f/4-5.6 to my kit yesterday and it's really good! Shooting at 10mm is quite an experience too. Really fun fitting so much into a frame. 😎
Quote from James Warner on July 17, 2022, 12:39 amNice kit! I have the 50-135 and can attest it is a great lens. The 10-24 seems like a nice wide angle zoom. @jbp There's also the Sigma 10-20 that can be had for cheap and I've heard from a few people they liked it. I have the Pentax 12-24 but that is a bit more, and I don't think much better optically. I'd have to check that for sure though.
I've also used the 10-17mm fisheye, and that's an interesting one. The fisheye effect is string at 10mm, but as you close in towards 17mm it gets less and less so making it almost a normal wide angle. Still more distorted than a normal ultra wide, but not fisheye.
Quote from ahoyhere on July 17, 2022, 1:01 amI had the Sigma 10-20mm back in the day (circa 2008) for my Nikon D300 and it was good then. I imagine any updates would be better.
Good advice! I added the 10-20 f/4-5.6 to my kit yesterday and it's really good! Shooting at 10mm is quite an experience too. Really fun fitting so much into a frame. 😎